Play Journal Entries

Fire Emblem Awakening

JadonJalline

08/22/2015 1:10 AM ·Spoilers

Uh... can someone explain to me how this fits into the Fire Emblem timeline? If Falchion defeated Grima, and Medeus... then who used it to slay Grima? Naga?

Advertisement

Comment

This post has no comments.

  • Marth?

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • is marth the first exalt? because it says the first exalt defeated grima

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • I believe yes. and you can also equip Lucina's Parallel Falchion to SpotPass / DLC Marth.

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • The whole "First Exalt" thing is so confusing and unnecessary They could've just had Marth and Medeus but instead it's never even mentioned what Marth did. Why is it that someone who did the same thing is recognized for it more than someone that had 2 games based on their story? So, this "first exalt" is basically if Marth was someone else but did the same things except Grima. Ew.

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • If Marth is the first exalt, then does that mean that there could be another Marth game? We do know that Marth founded Ylisse, but as much as I want another Marth game, it's quite unnecessary.

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • ... unless Grima is Medeus, but Medeus isn't that big, he's not a god, and is a different colour.

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • Marth and the first exalt are different characters.

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • What makes you think that?

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • But how do we know for certain that those dragons were defeated durring different time periods, or that Marth wasn't the first exalt? It is stated that Marth's decendants were those who carried the brand of Naga, and that the first exalt carried the brand, but it is never stated that they are the same, or different people, plus Marth founded Ylisse after Archanea was united into 1 empire.

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • But how do we KNOW that Marth didn't? He's only 20 by the end of Mystery, so that leaves plenty of time left for him to go to a foreign land, and make a deal with a goddess.

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • Your argument is that there's no proof that they aren't the same person, so they have to be the same person.

    Yeahs0
    Played
  • No, my argument is that there is no proof that they aren't the same person, so they COULD be the same person. Ever heard of q theory?

    Yeahs0
    Played

Add a Comment

You must sign in to post a comment.

Sign in using a Nintendo Network ID to connect to users around the world by writing posts and comments and by giving Yeahs to other people's posts. You can create a Nintendo Network ID using your Wii U console or your system in the Nintendo 3DS family.

Use of Miiverse Details about Miiverse

Report Violation to Miiverse Administrators

You are about to report a post with content which violates the Miiverse Code of Conduct. This report will be sent to Nintendo's Miiverse administrators and not to the creator of the post.

Violation Type:

Post ID: 3DB-NBL7-BXM-ZM8X-VR2-CLKU

Report Violation to Miiverse Administrators

You cannot report posts made automatically by a software title.

Edit Post

Select an action: