02/18/2014 9:47 PM ·Spoilers
@Taciturn Nope. There's still accuracy, speed ties, and secondary effects.
02/18/2014 9:47 PM ·Spoilers
Hopefully if they bring in a Chelandelure I'd switch to my Rotom, otherwise it would stop my Breloom in its tracks.
02/18/2014 9:48 PM ·Spoilers
@Tactiturn Just use all Pokémon with Battle Armor then. Simple.
02/18/2014 9:48 PM ·Spoilers
Oh, and either remove all abilities, or make them all the same.
02/18/2014 9:49 PM ·Spoilers
@Taciturn Wow, my comment ninja'd you in a whole new level.
02/18/2014 9:50 PM ·Spoilers
http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/ou-round-6-suspect-voting.3473304/ Here's people being part of Smogon.
02/18/2014 9:50 PM ·Spoilers
@2Can: Spore > Dark Void , as Spore has 100% accuracy, while Dark Void has 90%.
02/18/2014 9:51 PM ·Spoilers
Dark Void is 80% accurate.
This comment contains spoilers.
02/18/2014 9:51 PM ·Spoilers
For doubles, though. I didn't know it had 90%. Someone on PS repeatedly used it with his Smeargle.
02/18/2014 9:53 PM ·Spoilers
Oh, 80%? Didn't know it was that bad. But yeah, in Double Battles it's usually better.
02/18/2014 9:56 PM ·Spoilers
If Smogon is it's followers, then why is "Smogon" to blame? Wouldn't the followers be bad?
02/18/2014 9:57 PM ·Spoilers
The Metagame is unfair, as most other games' are. They need to deal with the fact that it is. They can ban all they want, but it just leads to more.
02/18/2014 9:59 PM ·Spoilers
"The point is, Smogon is bad." If Smogon is it's followers, than why not just say Smogon's followers are bad?
02/18/2014 10:02 PM ·Spoilers
Because Smogon IS its followers. Saying Smogon is bad, is saying its followers are bad. They are the same thing.
02/18/2014 10:03 PM ·Spoilers
The people who follow it are part of the rule system and whatnot. Meaning they created if, yes?
02/18/2014 10:03 PM ·Spoilers
If Smogon is made up of its followers, than why not just use the source material and say its followers instead of Smogon? I mean, you can say that...
02/18/2014 10:05 PM ·Spoilers
@Blake ... Because just saying its followers implies to some people like Lux and David that I don't recognize them as the same or that I don't disagree with their rules.
02/18/2014 10:06 PM ·Spoilers
@Blake "Smogon" is simpler than "Smogon's followers". It's one word instead of two.
02/18/2014 10:08 PM ·Spoilers
The followers make up Smogon, as you have stated with "SMOGON. IS. ITS. FOLLOWERS". So, what's the reasoning behind not just saying "I disagree with the followers that make up Smogon."?
02/18/2014 10:09 PM ·Spoilers
Also, those people who voted, that was only a very small fraction Smogon users, and probably all of the head people and whatnot.
02/18/2014 10:09 PM ·Spoilers
Because I'd rather not waste words and create ambiguity with specific claims.
02/18/2014 10:12 PM ·Spoilers
You really just don't understand how the thing works, do you? The people who created Smogon and make the decisions have the main influence over those decisions, but the followers do have some…
02/18/2014 10:14 PM ·Spoilers
…influence. The main people who have the most influence don't expect everyone to play by their rules outside of their servers, however the followers with little influence do, and they are the ones to…
02/18/2014 10:14 PM ·Spoilers
[1] The claim is specific and represents your views, the words are being used well (or your views as I understand them, as I made the statement).
02/18/2014 10:16 PM ·Spoilers
Tiers aren't just randomly named. Overused literally means overused. This is based by what people use on Smogons server. The followers are directly influencing Smogon.
02/18/2014 10:16 PM ·Spoilers
[2] First off, ambiguity is being inexact with language, so by using specific claims, ambiguity is not being created. Second, the claim is specific and unambiguous.
02/18/2014 10:18 PM ·Spoilers
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SuspiciouslySpecificDenial This is both specific and ambiguous.
02/18/2014 10:20 PM ·Spoilers
That's just how the tiers are named. They don't mean anything.
02/18/2014 10:22 PM ·Spoilers
No. That really is how they're determined. I remember specifically reading that and then realizing that the names actually mean something.
02/18/2014 10:26 PM ·Spoilers
Because it makes others suspicious on what exactly was left out. The meaning is no longer clear.
02/18/2014 10:30 PM ·Spoilers
@Lux Some of it is determined by specific people. Most of it is based on the community.
02/18/2014 10:32 PM ·Spoilers
Nope, there was a meaning, and a cause to be suspicious, just two separate thoughts at once. This is also quite unrelated, as my offered statement has only one purpose.
02/18/2014 10:33 PM ·Spoilers
And not all of the community is bad, just the ones that expect you the play by those rules no matter what.
02/18/2014 10:34 PM ·Spoilers
@Blake I think this whole side debate about grammar is trivial.
02/18/2014 10:36 PM ·Spoilers
"Smogon is very influential in the Pokémon community with many people treating their rules as the absolute truth. They're clearly powerful, perhaps even overpowered. I motion Smogon be banned." ...
02/18/2014 10:38 PM ·Spoilers
When you substitute Smogon's followers for Smogon as you would functioning off of "SMOGON. IS. ITS. FOLLOWERS", you end up with a statement where you say that Smogon's followers should be banned.
02/18/2014 10:39 PM ·Spoilers
So, Smogon. It's really just meh for me. I'm fine with their rules, just don't like the people.
02/18/2014 10:39 PM ·Spoilers
But (hypothetically, as this would be implausible to implement) then you would also be banning people who use Smogon's rules on appropriate places but not in the main game, as they would still be...
02/18/2014 10:40 PM ·Spoilers
@Blake Ok? So? By the way, the whole ban thing was a joke relating to how Smogon calls things overpowered and bans them.
02/18/2014 10:42 PM ·Spoilers
Well, if your statement's just "Smogon is very influential in the Pokémon community with many people treating their rules as the absolute truth" than what were you trying to say?
02/18/2014 10:44 PM ·Spoilers
I think it was justified. Perish Song should just be banned as a whole, though.
02/18/2014 10:45 PM ·Spoilers
Nothing is, just there's no reason for randomly stating a fact. You don't see me just posting "bananas are yellow".
02/18/2014 10:46 PM ·Spoilers
@Lux You point that out because Gengar is a favorite of yours. Yet you're okay with others' favorites being banned?
02/18/2014 10:47 PM ·Spoilers
Saying Bananas are yellow would not cause these kind of arguments... hopefully.
02/18/2014 10:48 PM ·Spoilers
@Lux I was informed by David that BS means Brilliant Strategy.
02/18/2014 10:49 PM ·Spoilers
I could see someone posting that and eventually the conversation turning into a conversation about reality... Anyway, that's beside the point!
02/18/2014 10:52 PM ·Spoilers
Any decent Ground, Psychic, Ghost, or Dark move demolishes it. And Substitute isn't going to get it too far.
02/18/2014 10:53 PM ·Spoilers
That if you were just posting that "Smogon is very influential in the Pokémon community with many people treating their rules as the absolute truth", there would be no reason to do it.
02/18/2014 10:57 PM ·Spoilers
MPL? I strangely feel like that's all of us in MLP or you made a typo...
02/18/2014 10:58 PM ·Spoilers
Also, any good physical attack can EASILY take it down. And, Focus Blast is unreliable.
02/18/2014 11:00 PM ·Spoilers
Well, if it was all a joke , then why defend it so much? Otherwise that's fit perfectly. And why not bring that up first?
02/18/2014 11:26 PM ·Spoilers
@Blake This post was a joke, but my opinions against Smogon are real.
02/18/2014 11:37 PM ·Spoilers
@Blake What Jason wrote in this post was a joke about how Smogon does a lot of banning. Everything in the comments, though, is to be taken seriously.
02/18/2014 11:44 PM ·Spoilers
With any game that isn't tweaked from the top down, I think some sort of user based regulation will naturally intervene to try and balance the competitive game, to try and keep it competitive.
02/18/2014 11:44 PM ·Spoilers
Smogon seems to be the name of the organisation that holds all the clout with regards to competitive Pokemon.
02/18/2014 11:45 PM ·Spoilers
That doesn't mean I like it though. From my decentish experience of competitive Pokemon, most teams are just C+Ped from Smogon's pages on them.
02/18/2014 11:46 PM ·Spoilers
The metagame got pretty stagnant in my time, especially on simulations where everything can be changed so quickly.
02/18/2014 11:48 PM ·Spoilers
Everything was just a reaction to everything else, so the entire game was just made up fickly trends. There would be a few players who were dedicated enough to devise counter-trends, which would then
02/18/2014 11:49 PM ·Spoilers
go on to become trends, which would be then get countered. There was very little original though. Just a lot of copy and pasting.
02/18/2014 11:50 PM ·Spoilers
Luckily it IS completely unofficial, and so can be ignored, providing you can find another person who is happy to do so.
02/18/2014 11:52 PM ·Spoilers
I really don't think Smogon was necessary to make Pokémon competitive. Nintendo bans half of the legendaries anyway so very few if any things are truly overpowered.
02/18/2014 11:52 PM ·Spoilers
I haven't played on a Battle Sim in years so I can't say anything about that.
02/19/2014 12:01 AM ·Spoilers
Whether it's necessary or not, I think the setting up of some sort of a competitive community in/was inevitable. I suppose the question is quite how much of a stranglehold it developed on the game