Of course wiierdguy! :-D Punk:Brilliant! Constantin and all others! Thank you for your thoughts! So many ideas! Great.I for myself have to think about them...
Good day everyone. I thank you for sharing your views so far. Here's my initial thought. I would like it to extend the little change I propose during the whole week to see how it goes. However, after
the final results, i will present all opinions in a logical manner on Sunday and for those that will not be bored from all the mathematical details every method proposed will be accompanied by a
Morning Consti. To clarify I understand your proposal its based around 50,000,000 increments so if I increase from 99M to 100M I will gain an extra point?
It 's really rather simple if you think about it and stands, according to my opinion, for a more fair point system combining two characteristics: 1. Reward every player. 2. Reward really big hi scores
Sorry mate. I wasnt dissing your ideas or the great work that you do with scoreboards. Just struggling with getting my head round your idea. Maybe im just being thick but it makes no sense to me :(
As long as you know how it works all I'm bothered about is how many points I have at the end of the week and it's a fair system of scoring. (You could use the Golden Ratio as well lol )
Marc i understand by your many posts that you cannot comprehend what i'm proposing but it is rather simple: Individual score X number of participants / highest score = score point. In other words >>
For example, today Skymaster has 1.780.000.000 pts and he is first, that means he gets 17 points because there are 17 participants and he is first. Sky master would get the same 17 points even with
I trust your judgement and fairness. My earliest memories of this comp was Paranormal you were leading yet still helping others out. We will let Hyna and the masses decide.
the old system. You, Marc, have today a score of 99.266.206 and you are 12th. With the old system you'd get 6 points just because you are 12th. With the point system I propose you get 1 point because
you are so far away from the top players score. In order to get more points you'll have to reach a higher score. The more you come close to Skymaster the more points you'll get. For example, Punk with
800000000 is closer to Skymaster and with the analogy he gets 9 points. On the other hand theoretically if all players are close to the top player they may all get 17 points. There may be occasions
My problem is most of us will never reach or come close to scores like that so yeah those with amazing scores should be rewarded but us mere mortals with average skills are
where this can happen. So the more you go higher the more points you get and your table score really affects the point you earn. I think it is a very honest and fair way of earning points and I really
stand for it no matter if it is easily comprehensible or not. I do respect everyone's opinion and I will follow the general point of view as I repeat that I am not here to force my idea. But, please
Marc, it is not true. With the old system you'd get none points. With this system you'd get 1 so far but not 6as I explained before. And yes, everyone's getting points, but let's not forget the ones
that are really trying to get hiscore. There must be rewarded in someway too. This system also gives meaning to the score you get and acts as an incentive to try for more. Which is the whole idea of
Marc, I feel that i have tried really hard to explain today specifacally to you what I am trying to do. I understand that you strongly disagree and there is nothing I can do to persuade you otherwise.
I have the greatet respect for you as a person, player and score master. Im just trying to champion the cause for us players who will pretty much be in the lower half of the table.
Marc, with all due respect, I hoped that by answering in an analysing matter to you with so many posts, I would make you understand why I propose this scoring method. I obviously failed to do so.
I don't understand any posting here. I think you vote right. (Ich enthalte mich der Stimme, weil ich das nicht verstanden habe, schliesse mich der Mehrheit aber an. Ihr macht das schon) :-)
Marc:My friend,with Constantins idea there is no disadvantage for players with less scores!Everyone will still get points, at least one!If you get a higher or the highest score(like Lumi did) you'll
get more points in a kind of an award for your performance!I really think it's fair.Yeah I agreed to your idea and still think it's good,but now I can comprehend Constantin's system in the whole way.
You or I don't need any Euklid or Pythagoras or whoever for this!Constantin is the only one who needs a time machine to speak to these guys! ;-) Btw:Constantin,letting us voting is just fair! :-)
Jagman, I was using google translator pretending I can speak German again :) I said that if you can keep the ball for a while the table rewards you with an astronomical amount of points.
German was my mother language. I don't recall if I have mention it before but I was born and llived my childhood in a German speaking canton in Switzerland called Aargau.
